Factory robots cost millions to install. Outsourcing took years of planning. Even the internet disrupted industries over decades. Each of those transitions gave workers, industries, and policymakers time to adjust — imperfect time, but time.
AI is fundamentally different. The tools are cheap, fast to deploy, and improving at a pace that outstrips human ability to learn new marketable skills. Nobody — not economists, not technologists, not policymakers — has a clear picture of what the labor market looks like in five years. And no legislation is coming from Washington to manage the pace.
That leaves you. The National Labor Relations Act gives workers the legal right to have a voice in how workplace changes are implemented. Not to stop technology — but to ensure the people affected by these decisions are at the table when they're made.
The gap that matters
With collective action
Without it
Employer must bargain before AI changes your job
They can do it Monday morning
You can demand information about AI deployment plans
You find out when it's announced
Retraining, severance, and transition terms are negotiated
You get whatever they offer
Retaliation for raising concerns is illegal
Raising concerns is a personal risk
The difference isn't political — it's structural. Workers with collective voice have legal leverage. Workers without it have none. The NLRA exists to close that gap.